🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking followers viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents praising your insights on expanding your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to explore collaborations?

If not, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Changing Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Numerous female professionals joined a collective professional network test recently after viral posts suggested that changing their gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants modified their profiles to include what they called "masculine-oriented" language - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who use online business jargon.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to determine which posts appear to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" influence how content are received.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not influence how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after observing her reach decrease substantially.

The Process

• Initially, she modified her profile gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she recycled old posts with comparable "agentic" language

The outcome was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my posts were softer - brief and clever, but also friendly and human," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She abandoned the test after one week, stating "Each day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Some participants experienced favorable outcomes. One writer who modified both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, leading to unofficial tests where identical posts by male and female users received vastly different reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and spread posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."